The man was beaten to the end as a human trafficker
On the evening of June 14, two sisters of enthusiastic citizens, Peng Anjia and Peng Anyi, were passing by Yibin Xiaobei Street when they found a middle-aged woman with a two-year-old child who had been crying and looking for her mother, acting suspiciously. Suspecting that the child had been abducted, the Peng sisters stopped the woman for questioning, which aroused hundreds of onlookers. As a result, the police investigation found that the middle-aged woman, Xiao Meiling, was the aunt of Qiqi (nickname), a two-year-old boy in her arms. At this time, Xiao Meiling had a bleeding nose and was diagnosed with a broken nose bridge. Xiao Meiling said that a middle-aged man punched her during the chaos, and the local police have intervened in the investigation and issued an investigation notice to find the man who beat her.
Internet Vibe"Women grab dolls"
Police investigation: woman is the child's aunt
At about 21:20 on June 14, WeChat Moments spread the following news: "The baby-grabbing incident just happened on Xianxi Street in Yibin. Grandma Doll took a two-year-old boy and was accidentally taken away by a middle-aged woman. Fortunately, it was discovered quickly, and many enthusiastic people caught up and took the baby back! The woman was beaten badly, and now she is sent to Dongcheng Police Station! Please take good care of your children!" WeChat also sent four photos, one of which was a photo of a child crying; the other was a middle-aged woman who was suspected of being beaten and crying on a tricycle. The other two photos showed that the scene was packed with people.
Once the news was sent out, netizens forwarded it one after another. Many parents said they were "nervous", but some people questioned it was fake news. Yesterday, the mother of the child, Ms. Wang, confirmed to a reporter from Chengdu Business Daily that the WeChat Moments incident, which seemed to be full of positive energy, was just an "oolong incident" in which passers-by mistook the child's aunt for a human trafficker.
Ms. Wang told reporters that at around 19:30 that day, her son "Qiqi", led by her and her aunt Xiao Meiling, was going to Xufu Mall to play. On the way, she received a call with an urgent matter to deal with, so she hired a human tricycle for her son and sister, and left by taxi. At around 20:00 that day, she suddenly received a call from her husband who was working in other places, saying that her eldest sister Xiao Meiling had been mistaken for a human trafficker, and the adults and children were sent to the police station.
"My eldest sister is 49 years old. She is from Elephant Trunk Street in Cuiping District. She has been helping us take care of our children for the past two years, but she is not very clear-headed and has poor expression skills." Ms. Wang said that when she arrived at the Yibin Dongcheng Police Station, her two-and-a-half-year-old son asked, "Mom, are you here?" At this time, the eldest sister, Xiao Meiling, was sitting in a chair with blood on her face. After investigation, the police confirmed the relationship between Ms. Wang and the child again, and confirmed that Xiao Meiling was not a human trafficker, but the child's aunt.
Site Restoration
The woman was surrounded when the police arrived
The crowd accused her of being a human trafficker
Yang Chaobo, a police officer at the Dongcheng Police Station of the Cuiping District Public Security Bureau, said that at about 19:50 that day, the police station received instructions that a suspected human trafficker was detained by a crowd on Xiaobei Street in the urban area. "When we arrived at the scene, there were more than 100 people on the road, and it was chaotic."
The police separated the crowd and saw a 50-year-old woman sitting on a tricycle, holding a two-year-old boy in her arms and crying loudly. The onlookers accused her of being a "human trafficker", and the woman responded loudly, "He is my baby." The police asked the middle-aged woman at the scene about her relationship with the child, as well as the name and phone number of the child's father, but the woman did not answer, just crying, "The baby is mine."
"We persuaded her to go to the police station to explain the situation, but the woman did not listen, did not hand over the child and did not get out of the car." Yang Chaobo said that because of the chaos at the scene, the emotions of the women and the onlookers were very excited. The police were worried that the scene was out of control, so they took the child from the woman and took it to the police car. "After we carried the child over, the woman still hugged the tricycle and couldn't get off. The crowd was even more emotional, and it was not clear how many hands reached out to pull her." Yang Chaobo said that the woman was later taken to the police station, claiming that someone had beaten her. After calming down, the woman said her name was Xiao Moumou, and the child was the son of his younger brother,
The police then found Xiao Chuankai's phone number and initially confirmed the woman's name and identity. After that, the child's mother, Ms. Wang, came over, and the child called her mother directly. According to the household registration information, the police compared the identity information of Ms. Wang and the child and confirmed that the two were indeed mother and child. Ms. Wang also confirmed that the woman was called Xiao Meiling and was indeed the child's aunt.
Last night, Ms Wang posted on WeChat Moments: "Justice is right, but justice is not violence. Please find this abuser and give my sister justice. He doesn't need to pay money, but he must apologize." She called on the man who beat the man to come forward and asked the crowd at the scene to provide relevant clues about the man who beat the man. Yesterday morning, Ms Wang and Xiao Meiling went to Dongcheng police station again to report that they had been beaten, resulting in a broken nose, and provided a photo of the suspected attacker. At present, the police have issued an investigation notice and are looking for the attacker.
initiator
"Our starting point is good"
The zealous sisters find out the truth and feel a little guilty
Although the police quickly found out about this "oolong incident" and cleared Xiao Meiling of her innocence, the two sisters, Peng Anjia and Peng Anyi, who first suspected Xiao Meiling of being a human trafficker and stopped her, still felt a little remorseful in their hearts.
Peng Anjia told reporters that at that time, she and her sister Peng Anyi passed by Xiaobei Street and found that on the tricycle in front of her, a woman was carrying a child crying very fiercely, shouting for her mother. The woman grabbed the child's hand tightly. "We were very vigilant and followed the tricycle for a while." The two sisters followed for a while, wondering if the child was crying so hard, could the woman be a human trafficker? "My sister said to follow up and stop her to ask." Peng Anjia said that the two then chased the tricycle and asked the woman: "The baby is crying so hard, are you a human trafficker?" The woman replied: "I am his" big father " (aunt)."
"What about his parents?" the Peng sisters asked, and the woman said that the child's mother had left in a taxi. The woman's words deepened the sisters' suspicion, so they took out their mobile phones to take pictures of the woman, and the woman dodged while urging the three-wheeled master to hurry up. The women's avoidance behavior made the sisters even more suspicious, and the two stopped the three-wheeled car and took pictures of the three-wheeled master. "We told the three-wheeled master'If you dare to run with her, you are an accomplice '." Peng Anjia told reporters that the three-wheeled master stopped the car on the side of the road as soon as he heard it.
At this time, the crowd of onlookers also grew more and more, Peng Anjia said. "We asked her what the relationship was with the child, and she couldn't tell. Sometimes she said that the child was her own, and sometimes she said that the child was his grandson." Peng Anjia said that onlookers saw this and accused the women of being human traffickers. Later, they insisted on stopping the woman and the child and calling the police, and chased them all the way to the police station. They didn't leave until they heard that the woman might be a relative of the child.
"At that time, she couldn't explain her relationship with the child and wanted to run away. Everyone thought she was a human trafficker." Peng Anjia said after learning that Xiao Meiling was indeed the child's aunt. The result made her a little surprised and a little sorry, but their intentions were good. (Except for the victim and the police, the characters in the article are all pseudonyms)
police
The masses took it for granted and should call the police in time
According to the analysis of Chen Jin, deputy director of the police station, there are two main reasons for such a "misunderstanding":
First, the woman in question was very nervous and couldn't explain her relationship with her child, which led the onlookers to mistakenly believe that there was a problem with her relationship with the child.
The second is that the onlookers have a weak sense of the legal system. Without investigation and verification, they took it for granted to characterize the incident, and labeled the parties as "human traffickers".
Chen Jin said that it is a good thing that citizens are enthusiastic and vigilant, but everything must be handled according to the law. Anyone and anything cannot be arbitrarily characterized without investigation by the public security organs. "I hope everyone will encounter similar situations in the future and call 110 to report in time."
lawyer
The behavior of the batterer is illegal
Guo Gang, a lawyer from Beijing Huicheng (Chengdu) Law Firm, believes that in this case, the beater's behavior has obviously exceeded the necessary limit, has constituted a certain degree of harm, and has a certain degree of illegality. Lawyer Guo Gang reminds that whether it is self-defense, emergency avoidance or bravery, in addition to objectively obvious judgment that the perpetrator has violated the law, the law itself has a certain degree of tolerance for this provision. If it exceeds the tolerance, it will constitute illegal or even criminal.
Perspective "Kidnapping Oolong"
Passion and kindness, we need to be wary of the ending of "the wolf is coming"
Since Yu Jianrong, a professor at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, launched a Weibo campaign in 2011 to "take pictures and rescue begging children", the public's enthusiasm and kindness have been stimulated, and "Weibo anti-trafficking" and "Internet anti-trafficking" have become a vigorous "mass movement". However, behind the enthusiasm, the reality is very embarrassing. According to media reports, although children rescued through Weibo anti-trafficking are sometimes there, there have also been a lot of oolong incidents. For example, in 2014, the "beautiful baby was abducted on the 10th line of the Beijing Subway" incident that was noisy on the Internet. After a police investigation, the woman involved was the mother of the child.
Chen Shiqu, director of the Ministry of Public Security's anti-trafficking office, said that "if you find a child suspected of being abducted, you can call the police for verification. Please do not release unverified information with suspicious sources."
ask
Why is "Killing Oolong" frequent?
Faced with the frequent "anti-trafficking oolong", what we need to think about is: why does such oolong happen so often? Which link went wrong?
[1] Love that is easy to rush into
Starting from the goodwill of rescuing abducted children, it is not difficult to understand the feelings of "I would rather believe it or not" for celebrities and reposted netizens. I believe they are all with this love and kindness, and want to stimulate positive energy in society through the Internet. If the abducted children are successfully rescued, it will undoubtedly be a "good story" praised by everyone on the Internet. We have no intention of blaming the information publishers and reviewers. It is actually precious for individuals to maintain a kind public heart by virtue of Weibo, WeChat, etc. It is just that online information is "muddy", and it is easy to be rash without prudent love. Without discrimination, kindness may hurt people.
[2] Lack of self-censorship
We all know that print media cannot publish similar suspicious photos without verification, but there is a lack of such self-censorship for personal Weibo, and celebrity Weibo has no less impact of dissemination than print media. The more followers, the more public the personal Weibo is, the more careful it should be to publish information about other people's interests, and the more rational it needs to be verified. Perhaps the publisher and reviewer have no intention of deceiving, but white lies not only fail to gather positive energy in society, but also easily lead to the ending of the "wolf" story.
[3] The boundaries of rights to be clarified
Or as Chen Shiqu, director of the anti-trafficking office of the Ministry of Public Security, put it, "If you find a child suspected of being abducted, you can call the police for verification, and please do not publish unverified information of dubious origin." For every Internet user, the anti-trafficking "Oolong case" is not an accusation and accountability, but a rational teaching: you have the right to suspect anyone, but you should not publicly publicize your suspicion without verification, because the boundaries of your rights are precisely where the rights of others lie.
think
How to face the "kidnapping oolong" squarely?
In response to the frequent "trafficking oolong" incident, the reporter interviewed more than 10 netizens who had forwarded such messages. Many netizens said, "I don't care about the authenticity of the news. It's a matter of effort, and the child can find the best. It would be better if the child was not lost." It is because these "nosy" people have rescued so many abducted children. No one can guarantee 100% that the whistleblower does not have a misjudgment. Everyone should be tolerant.
However, some netizens thought, "Losing a child is a very painful thing, how can you be joking? Some people take advantage of the kindness of netizens, unscrupulously squander the enthusiasm of well-meaning netizens, and irresponsibly shout'wolf is coming ', which will make enthusiastic netizens no longer believe in the real information about finding children forwarded online. Not only will it cause real families in need to fall into trouble, but also damage the public trust and conscience of society."
In the face of the "Oolong Kidnapping Incident," well-known media personality Luqiu Luwei also gave her own opinion, "It is inappropriate to distribute photos of minors without the consent of their guardians, which will lead to lawsuits in some countries and regions. Should society'rather kill a thousand by mistake 'or'rather not hurt an innocent'?" Comprehensive Yangcheng Evening News, Beijing Times
